- ANY REASON NOT TO GO TO PICASA 3.9 HOW TO
- ANY REASON NOT TO GO TO PICASA 3.9 INSTALL
- ANY REASON NOT TO GO TO PICASA 3.9 FREE
if I have my own Eclipse installation (so not using the STS4 installer/bundle) and I install STS4 on top of it through its STS4 update site, then can I also install parts of STS3 using its own STS3 update site, expecting things to work? Or must I use the mentioned "STS3 Add-On Extension" from the marketplace? If so, how will the end result differ?.
ANY REASON NOT TO GO TO PICASA 3.9 HOW TO
until you explicitly deprecate XML config and non-Boot architectures) code and applications will just become harder.īy the way, I read, but I still have some questions on how to install STS3 over STS4. I'm also very sceptical that many seasoned Spring developers using STS3 and non-Boot technologies will ever come here to complain: they will use STS3 until available, then stop using it and all our everyday life to maintain legacy (or even non-legacy.
GitHub does not have votes, or stars, or anything like that (correct me if I'm wrong), should they fill this request with useless "+1" messages? This is one of the reasons I don't like GitHub issue tracking (compared to some good old alternatives, like JIRA was). I'm just concerned on how the community could really bring their voice here. Unless you reconsider some choices, of course.
ANY REASON NOT TO GO TO PICASA 3.9 FREE
But I'm not naive, and it's perfectly understandable that you have not the manpower to support two huge and parallel efforts shipped as free products and with many overlapping features, so in a real world STS4 is replacing STS3 (full stop) and the concrete result is that many technologies supported by STS3 and not STS4 are indeed penalised and in some way "deprecated", any Spring developer will have to take this into account, in one way or the other. If you had created a new tool alongside the old one, it would have been another story. Maybe the "problem" here is that you're not providing a new tool targeted at Spring Boot, but replacing an all-round tooling with many more features for Spring users (even non-Boot ones) and you're retiring the old one. So the more votes we get from the community for those enhancement requests, the better. But there has to be strong demand for those features. The same applies to the XML config support. If there is strong demand for adding support for non-boot Spring applications, we are completely open to that. We had to start with a clear focus (Spring Boot applications in our case) and iterate from there. This "starting-from-scratch" meant that we couldn't (and even if we could, we probably should not) blindly re-implement everything again that we had in the past. The reason for this focus is completely based on the fact that we almost completely started from scratch and based the Spring Tools 4 on a completely new tooling architecture (due to various technical reasons). The intent here is not a strategic one (like we are trying to push developers to Spring Boot). More details on this relationship can be found here: Of course you can continue to use Spring Tools 4 for Eclipse (for example) to develop non-boot Spring projects using the standard Java tooling of Eclipse - or install the STS3 Add-On Extension into an existing Spring Tools 4 for Eclipse distribution. The current version of the Spring Tools 4 is solely focused on Spring Boot applications when it comes to the Spring-specific features that we have implemented.
0 kommentar(er)
